Puerto-Rico-2.jpg

October 9, 2017 0

In the aftermath of the recent hurricane in the southern United States and the Caribbean, I’ve seen some heavy discussion surrounding the state of affairs of residential solar in Florida, and how the state’s residents are being affected by the current laws and regulations concerning solar in the area.

A recent article criticized Florida Power & Light (FPL), the major electric utility in the state, for not allowing owners of solar systems to activate their solar in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma when a majority of the grid was down. I noticed the article getting a lot of attention, and I also noticed a lot of misinformation surrounding discussion of the article and within the article itself.

FPL have historically been hostile toward solar. Just do a quick online search and you’ll find lots of news about their anti-solar lobbying, and even influencing the passing of laws requiring homeowners to connect to the grid, whether they plan on using it or not (basically killing off-grid solar). However, we can’t blame FPL in the recent post-hurricane situation. Requiring inverters to become non-operable in the event of a grid outage is not something FPL mandates; it comes from something called UL 1741. The Anti-islanding requirement was created so that when the grid goes down, solar inverters would not be pushing power onto what is supposed to be a de-energized grid, creating safety hazards for anyone working on the grid infrastructure. So even if FPL was totally okay with people running their inverters during a power outage, they wouldn’t be able to, because the inverter should have been designed with UL 1741 in mind, and simply would refuse to turn on without a grid connection.

So FPL are not the bad guys in the aforementioned situation, and homeowners shouldn’t be attacking them for enforcing a UL requirement and keeping their workers safe. This is (and should be) every electric utility company’s approach to this issue.

Most importantly, what we should be looking at are solutions to the problem of residents not being able to access their solar energy when they need it the most. How does someone keep their solar system operating even when the grid goes down? Why, batteries, of course! And even if FPL wants every single homeowner to connect to their grid, there are more and more systems out there (Tesla Powerwall, Sonnenbatterie, SMA Sunny Island, to name a few) that permit grid-connected solar and batteries with the option to operate off-grid in the event of a power outage.

With the way the market is trending, I can guarantee we’ll start seeing a push for these solar and battery grid-tied systems in Florida before too long. Of course, expect to see a push-back from FPL on the issue as well.

Richard Dobbins, P.E., is SepiSolar’s Chief Electrical Engineer 

***

Ready to register on SepiSolar’s Customer-Centric Online Portal? You can quickly request free quotes, view your project status, communicate with your team and more! Click here for a quick tutorial that shows you exactly what to do.

Media-1200x460.jpg

September 12, 2017 0

Ok, let’s cut to the chase. Here are the new Code sections that Bill Brooks and team have implemented as part of the new 2017 cycle and why they’re awesome:

NEC 691 – Large-Scale Photovoltaic (PV) Electric Power Production Facility

We finally have a section that addresses large-scale PV! Before this, all we had was 690.80 for systems over 1000 V, which just redirects us to generic ol’ NEC 490, which is for any equipment over 1000 V, not just photovoltaic (PV). Ok, we also had 705.12(C), but, admit it, that was a fairly useless section. Now, at least, we have a dedicated section for large-scale PV that will undoubtedly grow and evolve over time.

This section was not overdone. When introducing a new chapter, it’s very easy for the authors to go a bit nuts and add a lot of rules from the get-go without understanding how the article will be adopted, enforced, and exercised in the real world. I applaud the balance that the CMP crew brought to this particular section.

NEC 705 – Interconnected Electric Power Production Sources

New definitions! We now have definitions for microgrid systems and microgrid interconnects! The common message with the new 2017 NEC is definitions, definitions, and definitions. Even with old language (like grounding, where the phrase “functional grounding” is now being used), this NEC version is making a clear directive to be clear in how we talk and address these things. I, for one, am really thankful for the clarity this Code cycle brings to our industry.

120% rule on center fed panels. Remember how painful it was when 690.64(B), which later became 705.12(D), revised their rules to eliminate the 120% allowance for center-fed panels? Then, remember how Code officials allowed us to use the 120% rule but only if detailed busbar load calculations were provided? As much as I like to earn solar engineering business, I definitely do not believe in arbitrarily creating additional engineering and design work for industry professionals. The name of the game is to lower costs and accelerate system installations, without sacrificing safety. Well, let’s give a big shout out to the CMP panel because all those rules are now gone, and we can go back to the good ol’ days of using the 120% rule for center-fed panels. Be sure to check out the new 705.12(B)(2)(3)(d).

Available fault current and busbar load calculations remain. Sometimes when Code officials revert or “undo” certain code sections like the one above about the 120% rule for center-fed panels, they also undo some of the new code requirements that came along with those. Not this time. If you want to venture outside the industry standard and work on more complex interconnections, we still can perform detailed busbar calculations and fault current analysis to ensure that your (complex, unique) system is designed to Code.

NEC 706 – Energy Storage Systems

It’s finally here! I’m just so glad we finally have a section dedicated to energy storage. Sometimes I almost don’t even care what’s in it, just as long as it’s there, but this section goes above-and-beyond my wildest expectations for a great release of the first generation of an energy storage system-dedicated code section.

Definitions. Just read the definitions section. It’s a great read. Let’s all use this language to create clarity in an otherwise young, unclear, and ever-developing marketplace. Be sure to read the 3 italicized definitions in particular:

  • Energy Storage System, Self-Contained
  • Energy Storage System, Pre-Engineered of Matched Components
  • Energy Storage System, Other

It’s really important to understand the differences between these, since battery systems come together in the field in a variety of different ways, and if you want to fly through permitting and inspection processes, I suggest using the correct language for the correct system to help push projects through more quickly. For instance, UL 9540 is a standard now, let’s use it! Be sure to work with manufacturers that have this certification as it makes the entire process easier. Yes, UL 1642, 1973, and 1741 SA are all great standards to refer to, but nothing is quite as nice as having a full wrap of 9540 on all components.

Battery locations, terminations, and types, oh my! I think what I like most about this section is the care that the CMP took to address as many technology types and unique requirements as possible. For instance, the worst thing that can happen to a lead-acid or lithium battery is that it could explode or catch fire under short-circuit conditions. However, the worst thing that can happen to a flow battery is that it will leak and cause rusting of metal components. This code section attempts to address these unique concerns differently, for each technology, which is to say the Code officials are considering the uniqueness and specific applicability of these types of technologies and products. I like detail work!

NEC 710 – Stand-Alone Systems

I wouldn’t necessarily call this section revolutionary, but it is nice to finally have a standard. We’ve been designing and installing off-grid PV and energy storage systems for decades, and this is the first time there is a dedicated section to address those installations with some basic standards. This is a quick read, and it ought to confirm to anyone who’s designed or installed an off-grid system that this is how it ought to be done (at a minimum). I’m curious to see how this section develops and evolves over time. For instance, the PV must not be sized to handle 100% of load, batteries need not be included, etc. These are just some of the nice things to have in a Code that we can fall back on in the presence of inspectors or plan checkers.

Don’t worry, 690.56(A) and 706.11(B) still apply.

NEC 712 – Direct Current Microgrids

Again, read the definitions. I know I’m starting to sound like a broken record, but before we can agree on rules, costs, and benefits of these systems, we really need to understand how to talk about them. Here’s to assimilating code language in everyday work life!

Finally, we have a definition of system voltage. With DC micro-grids, it’s not uncommon to have 5 different voltages: low-voltage controls / sensing, high voltage power, DC-to-AC inversion, auxiliary loads, etc. Now we have a definition of what the entire system voltage ought to be. Read 712.30 to learn more. Same goes for available DC short-circuit current (712.65), OCPD (712.70), so I highly recommend reading this section. It’s only 2 pages, so it’ll be a breeze.

Thank you for reading, and as always, don’t hesitate to reach out to SepiSolar if you’d like to learn more about how to integrate these types of systems that can involve PV, energy storage, generators and grid interconnections, or for information about our solar consulting services. There are NEC codes coming out, UL standards, new product configurations, and new technologies entering the market, and as an independent, 3rd party technical consulting firm, we can provide unique perspectives on the state of these products, technologies, and applications to help ensure that your customers get the best experience and solutions possible. We’re here to help!

Visit this link for information about our solar consulting services for both residential and commercial projects.

Media-1-1200x464.jpg

August 23, 2017 0

Normally I don’t get excited when a new version of the NEC comes around. That’s because a lot of Code authors argue and change the rules around installing disconnects, DC conduits, or even worse, grounding. I swear, section 690.47 on Grounding Electrode Systems will never stop changing, and I’m sure the entire section will continue to be revised over and over again. Nobody ever seems to agree on active grounding of photovoltaic (PV) systems. It’s amazing what controversy that such a well-understood physical phenomena (“grounding”) can evoke out of installers and inspectors. But I digress…

The reason why I’m most excited about this new Code cycle is due to the addition of NEC 691, 706, 710, and 712. Bill Brooks, James Rogers, Jason Fisher and the rest of the CMP (Code-Making Panel) 4 team really did an amazing job with this new release of NFPA 70 (the NEC). For those of you who don’t know, the CMP principals are the ones who advise the NEC technical committees to add, subtract or modify various articles of the NEC in order to accommodate ongoing technology improvements, new applications and product configurations, etc., all in the name of health and safety. Feel free to check out the members on CMP-4 by clicking here.

For fellow California legacy solar aficionados who have been in the industry for a while, you’ll notice that Rhonda Parkhurst is also on this list (from the City of Palo Alto). For anyone thinking of moving to Palo Alto and wishing to go solar, there is the beautiful neighboring city of Menlo Park. It is just as gorgeous as Palo Alto, only a hop-skip-and-a-jump away from the VC’s of Sand Hill Road, and with a far simpler permitting process for solar PV. I’m digressing again…

So what’s the big deal about NEC 2017? Doesn’t it revise various grounding requirements again (we now have definitions of “functional grounding,” for instance), expand on rapid shutdown requirements and introduce seemingly empty articles, like NEC 691 on Large-Scale Photovoltaic (PV) Electric Power Production Facility, which offers a whopping 1.5 pages of material?

Well, sure, that’s one way of looking at it. But what I like best is that the Code is so much more clear, organized and broken down than ever before, when designing for PV, energy storage, and micro-grid systems. These types of systems are accelerating in adoption, complexity and benefits to consumers in ways the world has never seen.

When I started installing grid-tied Lithium battery systems to do demand charge reduction in New York City back in 2011 (I was a founding member and consultant of Green Charge Networks back in 2009), there were no codes that applied to our installations. It was a complete mess. I remember pulling Code language out of NEC 480 and 690.71, which were barely able to help, if at all, in order to justify to NYC inspectors that what we were doing was indeed Code-compliant and safe.

And that was the easy part because when you start to mix cutting-edge technologies like grid-connected battery systems with PV (DC- or AC-coupled), with or without a grid-connection (e.g., micro-grids, diesel gen-set, etc.), then you were really on your own because there wasn’t even a hint from the Code on how to design those systems in a Code-compliant way. The only way to proceed at that point is to use all the time, experience and knowledge you have from installing PV and other electrical systems in the past, use the best judgment you have and take great care to work with all stakeholders to ensure the system gets installed at the end of the day, without hurting the customer on costs, obstacles and delays. As usual, technology leads regulation, and being a pioneer on the cutting-edge isn’t always easy, but knowing as many rules and requirements as early as possible goes a very long way. Only the strong survive. Many PV installers, engineers, entrepreneurs and business executives understand what this means, and very few have made it out in one piece.

Stay tuned for our next newsletter where I would elaborate on these awesome code sections…….

Ready to register on SepiSolar’s Customer-Centric Online Portal? You can quickly request free quotes, view your project status, communicate with your team and more! Click here for a quick tutorial that shows you exactly what to do.

 

iStock-478494086_small.jpg

August 15, 2017 0

Whether you own solar panels, are a customer of our commercial solar services or are an astronomy aficionado, Monday is going to be an exciting day. On August 21, 2017, the moon will pass between earth and the sun. The moon will block the view of the sun in many parts of the country, some partially and a few completely.

The last eclipse of this kind was in 1979—and the national electricity grid was completely different back then. Solar panels were rare during that era; today solar power is growing in leaps and bounds. The increasing presence of solar panels makes many wonder what the eclipse means for those households and businesses powered by solar.
What will happen for solar users when the sun is eclipsed on Monday for two minutes and 43 seconds? Will the country’s utility scale solar energy plants go dark?

NERC Does Not Expect Reliability Issues

The good news is that experts do not believe we will experience blackouts. Much attention and planning has been directed at preparing for the eclipse’s impact. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), a nonprofit regulatory body that works with the entities controlling the grid, does not anticipate reliability issues for the bulk power system. Their analysis was shared in their 2017 Summer Reliability Assessment published in April.

While sunlight will be obscured during this monumental event, demand and supply play a role in how electricity will be affected. The eclipse’s path of totality starts in Oregon and moves east towards South Carolina over a 90 minute period. Solar generators directly in the path of totality will be most affected the most during the eclipse. In those areas, other sources of power will increase output to compensate for the temporary decrease in solar energy. Only 17 solar photovoltaic generators fall in this category, most of which are located in eastern Oregon. Those not directly in the path of totality will be less affected.

Preparing for the Future

What we learn during this eclipse will help us better understand and plan for the next one, which occurs in 2024. By then, solar power may be ubiquitous—it has grown approximately 68 percent per year over the past 10 years. The eclipse on August 21 will help us better prepare and discover how well the country’s system works when the sun goes dark.

Visit this link to learn more about our commercial solar services.

iStock-516920528.jpg

August 3, 2017 0

August 2 was Earth Overshoot Day, and while it sounds like one of those quirky internet holidays, it is not one that our solar consulting services company celebrates. In fact, it’s a day no one will celebrate. It’s the date when the population’s demand for natural resources in a given year exceeds the planet’s capacity to replenish them. Formerly known as Ecological Debt Day, it marks the point when the yearly deficit truly begins.

The Concept

Earth Overshoot Day is calculated by the Global Footprint Network. This international group strives to changes how the world manages climate change and its ecological resources. They developed the Ecological Footprint, which measures the natural resources remaining on our planet against demand. To determine Earth Overshoot Day, they calculate how many days of the year that the Earth’s biocapacity can fulfill the population’s demand. The remaining number of days left during that year represents the overshoot.

Since Earth Overshoot Day fell on August 2, this means that every day until 2018, we are operating at a deficit of natural resources. This means that all the natural resources used from now until then are unsustainable. It’s a scary prospect considering we are barely halfway through the year.
The first Earth Overshoot Day was devised by Andrew Simms of the New Economics Foundation in London. In 2006, the think tank partnered with Global Footprint Network to launch the first campaign for the overshoot concept. That year, Earth Overshoot Day happened in October. If you do the math, you’ll find that in just over 10 years, we’ve already “lost” two months.

Contributing Factors

Much research shows that the three major factors affecting our dwindling natural resources include deforestation, overfishing and the emission of greenhouse gases. A way you can quickly contribute towards reducing this resource deficit is to go solar! Solar panels use no combustion and therefore emit no greenhouse gases to generate power. Going solar will reduce your carbon footprint and ultimately save you money on utilities.

Click through for information about our solar consulting services.

iStock-494469348.jpg

June 29, 2017 0

It’s Energy Week—the perfect time to consider our residential or commercial solar services if you haven’t already. While the Trump Administration’s goal is for our country to become “energy dominant,” you can make a difference just by going solar. While plans to boost fossil fuel production may harm our environment, if we promote energy efficiency and sustainable resources, we can offset some of the harmful effects of greenhouse emissions.

The Plan for Energy Dominance

The Administration recently shared its plans to become self-reliant from other nations. This would make us a secure nation, free from dependency on the countries who use energy as an economic weapon. We would no longer be impacted by geo-political turmoil endured in these regions of the world. Since 1953, the United States has be a major net energy importer; with technological advancements, this can change. The Administration’s goal is to use these innovations to make our great nation a net exporter of natural gas by 2028. This would mean more job growth and expansion across the industry. Yet what will the environment impact be?

How to Make a Difference

What we can focus on now as individuals and business owners is utilizing sustainable energy sources and overall efficiency practices. It’s more important than ever to reduce our collective carbon footprint—and going solar is the perfect way to do this. When you install solar panels, combustion is unnecessary to power your home or building. This means no gas emissions and no environmental repercussions. You’ll also decrease your personal or business’ dependence on energy generated by fossil fuels, which reduces demand on utility companies.

Another way to help the environment and conserve resources is to employ energy efficiency on a personal level. Efficient technologies reduce waste and provide the same level of service using less energy. For example, many have taken to using compact fluorescent bulbs in lieu of traditional incandescent ones, as the former uses less electricity. This kind of practice helps even if you have solar, as it can contribute to your overage. Another great example of energy efficiency is insulation. Insulated homes and buildings require less energy to cool or heat.

If you’re ready to make a considerable difference, contact us now for information about our residential and commercial solar services.

iStock-516920528.jpg

April 20, 2017 0

Saturday, April 22 is Earth Day. It’s the perfect time to consider going solar if you haven’t already. Solar energy was first harnessed

CA Small Business Enterprise

Certification ID:
2015743

Bidder/Supplier ID:
BID0068933

NAICS Codes:
541330 – Engineering services
541340 – Drafting services
541490 – Other specialized design services
541618 – Other management consulting services
541690 – Other scientific and technical consulting services
541990 – All other professional, scientific, and technical services

D-U-N-S number:
065817064
CAGE:
8F5K7

UNSPSC Code:
811024, 81101701, 81101516, 81101604, 43232614, 81101505




Subscribe to the SepiSolar newsletter:


Subscribe Now